The idea of relations may be extended to objects. In the adjacent figures, the five red circles represent boats, and the six blue circles represent poles on a dock. Some or all of the boats are tied to some of the poles. In Fig I, some boats are tied to poles, and two boats use their own anchors.
In Fig II, all of the boats are tied to some poles.
These ropes relate boats to poles. The open statement
It is customary to be concerned with only the true relations. Unless mentioned otherwise, b ~ c means that object b is truly related to object c.
The relations exist between objects in two sets, BOATS = {1,2,3,4,5} and POLES = {1,2,3,4,5,6}. No confusion exists if it is said that the relations exist between the sets BOATS and POLES themselves.
-----
The following is a technical definition of a relation between two sets:
[1.1] (Relation between two sets) A relation between two sets is a subset of their Cartesian product.
Notation: x ~ y if and only if the ordered pair (x,y) is in that subset.
For a discussion of Cartesian products click here.
It is possible to produce a relation from a given relation.
[1.2] (Reverse relations) For any relation between sets U and V, the reverse relation is between V and U and is obtained by reversing every relation x ~ y between objects x in U, y in V, to get y ~ x. which is called the reverse relation of x ~ y.
For the relation in FIg IV,
given relation: 1 ~ 2, 2 ~ 2, 3 ~ 6, 4 ~ 4, 5 ~ 5
reverse relation:
2 ~ 1,
2 ~ 2,
4 ~ 4,
5 ~ 5,
6 ~ 3
Clearly the reverse relation is different from the given relation.
The truth values of relation of x ~ y and y ~ x may be the same or may be different. If ~ means "is tied to" then all of the above relations are true. The reverse of "John is the father of Bill" is "Bill is the father of John". Obviously, both relations cannot be true.
[1.3] (Symmetric relations) A relation is symmetric if every relation between objects and its reverse have the same truth value.
Notation: Relation ~ is symmetric if and only if x ~ y always implies y ~ x.
In the above example, a boat "is tied to" a pole always implies that the pole "is tied to" the boat. So "is tied to" is a symmetric relation. Also symmetric are the following relations:
"is a brother of", "is equal to", "has the same color as", "is in the same subset as", "is parallel to"
Not symmetric relations are "is father of", "is less than", "is taller than".
The idea of linking abstract objects together is discussed in graph theory. There is a volume on this subject in the collection of volumes.
Recall from Volume I the idea of equivalence.
Two objects are equivalent if they have the same property and all other distinguishing properties are ignored.
Suppose a bag contains 5 apples, 4 oranges, 3 peaches, 3 plums, all in excellent condition. All the apples are equivalent, so are equivalent the oranges, so are the peaches and so are the plums. The equivalence ignores different weights, sizes, number of seeds, etc. Let x,y,z denote the fruit in the bag. Then
[2.1] (Equivalence relations) A relation ~ on a set U is an equivalence relation if and only if it satisfies the following three conditions:
(a) the relation is reflexive: for all objects x in U, x ~ x;
(b) the relation is symmetric: for all objects x,y in U, if x ~ y then y ~ x;
(c) the relation is transitive: for all objects x,y,z in U, if x ~ y and y ~ z then x ~ z.
Example [2.1a] The simple relation ~ on N5 = {1,2,3,4,5} defined by only three relations between objects:
[2.2] (Equivalence classes) Let there be an equivalence relation on a set U. If all the objects are gathered into collections of equivalent objects then those collections form a partition of the set. The collections are called equivalence classes.
For a discussion supporting [2.2] click here.
[3.1] (Functions) A function from a first set to a second set is a relation between the two sets satisfying the following conditions:
(a) every object in the first set is involved in the relation;
(b) no object in the first set is related to more than one object in the second set.
Notation: f: U → V means that f is a function from set U to set V.
Example [3.1a]
The adjacent figures show again two relations between boats and poles.
In both figures, the collection of boats is the first set and the collection of poles is the second set. Relation A in Fig III is not a function because it violates both conditions. It violates (a) because
boat 1 and boat 5 are not involved in the relation. It violates (b) because boat 3 is related (tied) to two different objects in the second set, namely pole 3 and pole 4.
On the other hand, Relation B in Fig IV is a function because it satisfies both conditions. Every boat is involved (tied up), and no boat is related (tied) to two different poles.
Notice that boat 1 and boat 2 in Fig IV are related (tied) to the same pole 2. A function is allowed to relate different objects in the first set to a single object in the second set (but a function must not relate a single object in the first set to different objects in the second set). Also notice that not all the poles are involved (used). A function need not involve all objects in the second set (but it must involve all objects in the first set).
In fact, it is impossible for all five boats to be tied to all six poles and not violate condition (b).
Example [3.1b]
This time let the first and second sets be the integers J. Relate each integer to its square: x ~ x2. All the integers x are involved, so condition (a) is satisfied. Every integer x has only one square x2, so condition (b) is satisfied. So squaring each integer is a function. Even though both 3 ~ 9 and -3 ~ 9, that is permitted for a function.
Almost never is the notation ~ used for a function. Sometimes an arrow is used, pointing from objects in the first set to objects in the second set. For the function in Fig IV,
Example [3.1c]
Let J = set of all integers.
The function g: J → J that triples every integer can be defined by writing
If f: U → V is the function that relates object x in the first set U with object y in the second set V then y = f(x) expresses this relation. This also allows the plotting of points (x,y) that satisfy this equation. For real numbers , and y, if
If y = f(x) then f relates x to y. y is then called the image of x. In Fig IV above,
A function from a first set to a second set involves all objects of the first set. The first set is also called the domain of the function. In Fig IV, the domain of the function is
The adjacent figure shows a function f from a first set (red rectangle) to a second set (interior of the larger black rectangle). The solid blue rectangle is the range of f. What is outside the rectangle is not in the range of f. So part of the second set is not in the range of f. That part contains no images of objects in the domain of f. If y is an object in that part then it is impossible to find an x such that f(x) = y. The range need not be all of the second set. But sometimes it is, as discussed in the next section, Special Functions.
These discussions use either of two methods to show a function carrying objects onto objects: verbal notation, arrow notation, and function notation involving objects x and y.
verbal notation function f carries x onto y.
arrow notation f: x → y
function notation f(x) = y.
The arrow notation used in Fig IV shows what objects in the domain are related to what objects in the range. The arrows always point to the images. For this reason, often it is said that the function carries an object (in the domain) onto an object (in the range). In Fig IV,
the function carries 3 onto 6.
In arrow notation: 3 → 6.
In function notation: f(3) = 6, where the f is tne name of the relation of boat tied to pole
The first two notations are useful if the name of the function is not needed. The last notation is sometimes useful if more than one function is involved.
Consider a function f: N10 → N25 defined by
[3.2a] ("onto" subsets) A function carries a first set to a second set. It carries a subset of the first set onto a subset of the second set if and only if
the image of every object in the first subset is in the second subset and every object in the second subset is the image of some object in the first subset.
Notation1: let f: U → V be a function. Let A be a subset of U and B be a subset of V. f carries A onto B if and only if
(i) f(x) is in B for every x in A;
(ii)for every y in B there is an x in A such that f(x) = y.
Notation2: f(A) = B.
Recall that a subset may be the whole set. Then condition (i) is not needed since the first set is the entire domain of the function.
[3.2b] ("onto" functions) A function carries a first set onto a second set if and only if every object in the second set is the image of some object in the first set.
Notation1: f:U → V is a function from U onto V if and only if every object in V is the image of some object in U.
Notation2: f(U) = V.
In the adjacent figure a U =circle (first set) and its V = diameter (second set) are given. For any point P in the circle drop a perpendicular line and let point P' be the intersection with the diameter. Then the function that carries P onto P' carries the circle onto the diameter. Every point on the diameter is the image of a point on the circle, usually two points on the circle.
-----
The following gives the conditions that two functions be equal:
[3.3] (Equality of functions) Two functions from a first set to a second set are equal if and only if they satisfy the following conditions
(a) they have the same domains;
(b) they carry each object in that domain onto the same object in the second set.
Notation: f = g if and only if (a) domain of f = domain of g, and (b) for every x in the domain, f(x) = g(x).
Intuitively speaking, equal functions do the same thing to each object in the common domain.
There is a redundance in [3.3]. If the two functions carry the same first set (into a second set), then the domains are already equal. But condition (a) is given to make identifying equal functions easier.
Example: if the first and second sets are the integers J, and f and g carry J into J, defined by
Notice that for equality, f and g must carry every object x in their common domaim onto the same object in the second set f(x) = g(x), not just some of the objects in the common domain x, and some other objects x' in the common domain onto different objects in the second set, f(x') not equal to g(x').
-----
Even though the phrase that a function is from a first set to a second set, it is quite possible that the second set is the same as the first set. In that case the range of the function is contained in the domain. Then the function is said to be from the set to itself: f:U → U. The function then carries objects in the set back into the same set. For example,
the function f: N5 → N5 defined by
[3.4] (Fixed points) A function from a set to itself leaves an object fixed if and only if it carries that object onto itself.
Notation: b is a fixed point of f if and only if f(b) = b.
The identity function leaves every object fixed. The other extreme is also possible; a function may have no fixed points whatsoever. For example, the function g defined by
Repeat the above using the same functions but with function notation.
Intuitively speaking, looking at g and f separately, the function gf carries objects in N5 onto objects in N6. Then g carries these objects from N6 onto objects in N7. The notation for this interpretation is g(f(x)).
But looking at gf as a single function, it carries objects in N5 directly onto objects in N7, ignoring N6 completely. The notation for this
interpretation is (gf)(x). But usually the excess parentheses are omitted, and the notation gf(x) is sufficient. Then either interpretation is allowed. The product gf is written in referse order so that f carries first objects from the first set into the second set. Intuitively speaking, gf is written backward, so that f is the first to carry objects in g(f(x)). Some algebraists prefer to write the function notation (x)f Intuitively speaking, gf is written backward, so that f is the first to carry objects in g(f(x)). Some algebraists prefer to write the function notation (x)f instead of f(x) so that the product fg can be written (x)fg. In these discussions the notation f(x) is used and not (x)f, and hence gf iss the product of f and g. But for clarity, the arrow notation often will be used, where fg is the product of f and g.
[3.5] (Product of functions) Let a first function carry all objects of a first set into a second set, and a second function carry all objects of that second set into a third set. Then the product or composition of a first function and a second function carries all objects of the first set into the third set, where the second function carries the images of the first function into the third set.
Notation: Let f:U → V and g:V → W. Then gf: U → W, and
for any x in U, gf(x) = g(f(x)).
Quite often two fuknctions are defined by what they both do to variable x. For example using
verbal notation
Define f and g as follows:
f carries x onto 2x and g carries x onto x + 1.
before attempting to compute theproduct, replace the image 2x by y. At the same time replace all the x's in the definition of g by y'x.
Then f carries x onto y and g( carries y onto y + 1.
Then the product will carry x onto (y and then onto) y + 1.
Replace all y's by 2x to get: the product will carry x onto 2x + 1.
arrow notation:
Define f and g as follows
f: x → 2x and g: x → x + 1
Replace image 2x by y. at the same time replace all the x's in teh definition of g by y's
f: x → y and g:y → y + 1
Then
x → y → y + 1
replace all y's by 2x to get
x → 2x → 2x + 1
Therefore
fg: x → 2x + 1.
function notation
Define f and g as follows
f(x) = 2x and g(x) = x + 1
Replace image 2x by y. at the same time replace all the x's in teh definition of g by y's
f(x) = y and g(y) = y + 1
Then
gf(x) = g(y) = y + 1
Replace all y's by 2x to get
gf(x) = g(2x) = 2x + 1
Therefore
gf(x) = 2x + 1.
Notice that the range of f in [3.5] is contained in the second set V. The domain of g is the entire second set V. Therefore, the range of f is contained in the domain of g. This last statement is the necessary and sufficient condition that gf can be formed (computed).
Some people may say that the condition is equivalent to the statement g is conformable to f.
The reader can show that the product of g and f is 2(x + 1). this shows that in general, product of functions is not commutative. It willb be assumed here that the product of functions is associative:
the product of f and (the product of g and h) = the product of (the product of f and g) and h.
Intuitively speaking such a function "covers" the second set with a saturation barrage of objects carried from the first set. Every object in the second set is an image of some object in the first set. The range of the function is the entire second set.
Another special function is the following:
[4.2a] (One-to-one functions) A function from a first set to a second set is one-to-one if and only if it carries distinct objects from the first set onto distinct objects in the second set.
Notation1: if x1 is not equal to x2 then f(x1) is not equal to f(x2).
Notation2: 1-1 means "one-to-one".
Example [4.2i] The function in Fig IV above is not one-to-one because it carries distinct objects 1 and 2 onto a single object 2.
Example [4.2ii] Tie the boats to poles differently:
Definition [4.2a] is useful if the first set (domain) is very small. Suppose there are 1000 boats and 2000 poles. The boats are tied up systematicly to the poles according to the rule:
[4.2b] (One-to-one functions) A function from a first set to a second set is one-to-one if and only if the only way that two (or more) objects in the first set can be carried by the function onto the same object in the second set is that those objects in the first set be equal.
Notation: If f(x1) = f(x2) then x1 = x2.
The equality f(x1) = f(x2) says that f carries objects x1 and x2 onto the same object in the second set. Then the implication
Example [4.2iii] Let f:N → N be the doubling function f(x) = 2x. To show that f is 1-1 start with the implication
An important function is both one-to-one and "onto":
[4.3] (One-to-one correspondences) A one-to-one correspondence between a first set and a second set is a one-to-one function from the first set onto the second set.
Notation: f:U → V carries distinct objects in U onto distinct objects in V, and every object in V is an image of some object in U.
There are to parts to proving that a function is a one to one correspondence:
the function is one-to-one;
the function is onto (the second set).
Example [4.3a] Let N6 and N6 both be the set of the first six natural numbers. Define f by
1 → 5,
2 → 4,
3 → 3,
4 → 2,
5 → 6,
6 → 1
The adjacent figure is a vertical representation of this function..
Clearly f does not carry anything in N6 onto two different things in N6. Therefore, f is 1-1.
Also every thing in N6 is an image (has an arrow pointing to it). Therefore, the function is "onto", and it qualifies as a one-to-one correspondence.
Example [4.3c] The identity function on any non-empty set is a one-to-one correspondence.
Example [4.3d] Let g: J → J be a function on the set of all integers, defined by
In Example [4.3a] the function there is a one-to-one correspondence between N6 and N6. Both sets have the same number of objects. This idea may be extended to all kinds of sets.
[4.4] (Having the same number of objects) A pair of sets have the same number of objects if and only if there is a one-to-one correspondence between them.
This definition is the basis for counting. There are 100 balls in a bag if and only if there is a one-to-one correspondence between the set N100 and the set of all those balls. But [4.4] also applies to infinite sets. As an example, there are the same number of negative integers as positive integers. the correspondence -n ↔ n is one-to-one and onto.
Click here for further discussion of infinite sets.
-----
An important question is: if two functions have a common property does their product have that property? The following answers this question affirmatively for the three special functions.
[4.5] (Preservation of special functions through products) Let f be a function from a first set to a second set, and g be a function from the second set to a third set. [If arrow nottion is used beetween objects, then replace gf by fg.]Then the product gf is a function from the first set to the third set.
(a) if f and g are "onto", then gf is "onto".
(b) if f and g are one-to-one, then gf is one-to-one.
(c) if f and g are one-to-one correspondences then gf is a one-to-one correspondence.
Part (a)
To prove gf is "onto." Let z be any object in the third set. Since g is "onto" then there is an object y in the second set such that z = g(y). But since f is "onto" there is an object x in the first set such that y = f(x). Then z = g(y) = g(f(x)) = gf(x). Therefore, gf is "onto", because z is any object in the third set, and x is an object in the first set, so z is an image of x.
Part (b)
To prove gf is one-to-one. Let x1 and x2 be distinct objects in the first set. Since f is one-to-one, then f(x1) and f(x2) are distinct objects in the second set. But g carries distinct objects from the second set into the thrid set. So g(f(x1)) and g(f(x2)) are distinct objects in the thrid set. Therefore,
x1 and x2 are distinct objects in the first set ==> gf(x1) and gf(x2) are distinct objects in the third set set
This proves that gf is one-to-one.
Proof of part (c) follows immediately from part (a) and part (b).
According to [4.5], the properties "onto", one-to-one and one-to-one correspondence are preserved through product of functions.
-----
Let f and g be functions from N5 to N5 defined by
f:
1 → 5,
2 → 2,
3 → 4,
4 → 1,
5 → 3
g:
1 → 3,
2 → 4,
3 → 4,
4 → 5,
5 → 3
The reverses of f and g are:
reverse f:
1 → 4,
2 → 2,
3 → 5,
4 → 1,
5 → 3
reverse g:
3 ~ 1,
3 ~ 5,
4 ~ 2,
4 ~ 3,
5 ~ 4
Then reverse f is a function from N5 to N5. But reverse g is only a relation between N5 and N5. These two functions f and g show that
the reverse of a function may or may not be a function.
Intuitively speaking, there is something "defective" with singular functions like g.
A function is singular if its reverse is not a function (but only a relation).
On the other hand non-singular functions like f are not "defective".
The reverse of a non-singular function is called the inverse of the function.
Notation: f-1 = inverse of a non-singular function f. A singular function like g has no inverse. Therefore, g-1 has no meaning, and cannot be used.
What determines whether a function is singular or non-singular? A close inspection of the blue numbers in the definition of f shows that every number in N5 appears. Therefore f is a function onto N5. All red numbers appear once and only once. This makes f one-to-one. This discussion indicates that only for one-to-one correspondences is the reverse relation a function.
[4.6] (Non-singular functions) A function is non-singular if and only if the function is a one-to-one correspondence.
Click here to see a discussion supporting [4.6].
Let f be a function from a first set to a second set. In summary the following are equivalent terms:
f is non-singular, the inverse f-1 exists and is a function, f is a one-to-one correspondence
f is singular, the reverse of f is only a relation, not a function f is not a one-to-one correspondence.
A singular function fails to be "onto" the second set, to be one-to-one or fails to be both "onto" and one-to-one.
[4.7] (Product of a function and its inverse) Given a function, which is a one-to-one correspondence, from a first set to a second set. Then its inverse (reverse) is a function from the second set back to the first set and is itself a one-to-one correspondence..
(a)The product of the given function and its inverse is the identity function on the first set.
(b) The product of the reverse function and the given function is the identity function on the second set.
Notation: (a) f-1f = Ifirst set. (b) ff-1 = Isecond set.
If f carries object x in the first set onto object y in the second set, then as a reverse function, f-1 carries y back onto x. Therefore, for any object x in the first set, f-1(f(x)) = f-1(y) = x = I(x). Then f-1f(x) = I(x) for every x in the first set. By equality of functions [3.3], f-1f = I.
For a proof that the inverse of a one-to-one correspondence is itself a one-to-one correspondence click here.
Often [4.7] is used as a definition of inverse of a function if the inverse exists. The term "reverse" is not used in other works.
[5.1a] (Permutations) A one-to-one correspondence between a finite collection of distinguishable objects and the same collection is called a permutation on the collection.
This is the standard definition of a permutation. Fig 1 shows two copies of a collection of five colored balls and a one-to-one correspondence from one copy to the other, so it is a one-to-one correspondence of the collection with itself. Fig 1 is a pictorial example of a permutation as defined in [5.1a].
Fig 2 is the result of replacing balls in the right column of Fig 1 by balls in the left column. The ball at the tail of the long arrow replaces the ball at the head of the arrow. For example, the yellow ball in the left column replaces the red ball in the right column. Therefore, the column on the right of Fig 1 has a change of apparance from the replacements as shown in Fig 2.
In Fig 3 all balls in Fig 1 are replaced by location numbers from N5. Long arrows in Fig 1 are replaced by short arrows between location numbers. For example, in Fig 1, a long arrow links the orange ball in the left column with the red ball in the right column. These balls have location numbers 1 and 3. Therefore, 1 → 3 expresses what the long arrow does. The other long arrows in Fig 1 are replaced by short arrows between numbers in N5. The collection of all short arrows
1 → 3, 2 → 4, 3 → 2, 4 → 1, 5 → 5
shows actually a function from N5 onto N5, in fact a one-to-one correspondence. In this section the following form of [5.1a] will be used:
[5.1b] (Permutation of location numbers) A permutation of n objects is a one to one correspondence between Nn and itself, where Nn supplies the unique location numbers of the objects.
A graphical representation of locations and their numbers will often be the following:
The locations of n objects will be conveniently represented by a horizontal row of n blanks. Sometimes the objects themselves will occupy the blanks. Unter the blanks are the numbers from Nn in increasing order. In discussions of permutations, another collection of blanks and numbers may be included.
_ _ _ _ .... _ _ _ _ _ _ .... _ _ 1 2 3 4 n 1 2 3 4 n
[5.2] (Arrangements) A collection of n objects is in the form of an arrangement if and only if each object is in a place that has a unique location number taken from 1,2,...,n . The complete assignment is called a sequential ordering of the n objects.
In the figures to the right, the same five balls are involved in all four figures. Fig CC, Fig DD, Fig EE and Fig FF show different arrangements. (There are actually 120 different arrangements of of the same five distinct objects.)
When a new arrangement is made from an existing arrangement, the same locations are used, but each object has a specific destination whch may have a different location number. For example, in moving the balls around to go from Fig CC to Fig EE, the following "plan" tells how to do it:
1 → 4, 2 → 5, 3 → 2, 4 → 3, 5 → 1
where each arrow involves a ball of a different color. Similarly, for balls re-arranged from Fig EE to Fig FF,
1 → 4, 2 → 2, 3 → 1, 4 → 5, 5 → 3
These are arrow notations for two functions, in fact one-to-one correspondences between N5 and itself. According to [5.1b] they are also permutations of the location numbers.
The identity function I which leaves all the location numbers fixed (and hence moves nothing to get a different arrangement) is considered a trivial permutation.
-----
What is the simplest non-trivial permutation of location numbers? It is any permutation that moves exactly two objects. Examples are:
1 → 4, 2 → 2, 3 → 3, 4 → 1, 5 → 5
1 ↔ 4
1 → 1, 2 → 2, 3 → 5, 4 → 4, 5 → 3
3 ↔ 5
1 → 1, 2 → 3, 3 → 2, 4 → 4, 5 → 5
2 ↔ 3
An elementary permutation leaves all numbers in Nn fixed except for two numbers. It interchanges the objects in these two locations. The two-headed arrow
[5.3] (Number of arrangements) From a source of n objects there are exactly n! arrangements to fill n locations, where n is any natural number.
Notation: n! = 1x2x...xn = product of all natural numbers from 1 up to and including n. (read n! as n factorial)
On N3 ={1,2,3} there are 3! = 6 permutations. On N4 = {1,2,3,4} there are 4! = 1x2x3x4 = 24 permutations.
Table:
1!=1, 2!=2, 3!=6, 4!=24, 5!=120, 6!=720, 7!=5040, 8!=40320, 9!=362880, 10!=3628800, 11!=39916800, 12!=479001600, 13!=6227020800.
It will be convenient to define 0! = 1.
Click here to see a discussion supporting [5.3a].
Although definition [5.3a] is more frequently used in these discussions, there is a more general and more common definition. Definition [5.3a] relates objects in the first arrangement indirectly with objects in the second arrangement by their location numbers. This relation is actually a one-to-one correspondence between objects in the source and objects in that same source.
-----
The arrow notation is one way to display a function. The notation b → c is read "b is carried onto c". It may haappen that somewhere there is another arrow c → d where the head of the first arrow (c) is the same as the tail of the second arrow (c). Here "c in turn is carried onto d". Two things may be done with such arrows:
[5.4] (Products) The product of permutations is a permutation.
The statement follows immediately from the fact that the product of one-to-one correspondences is a one-to-one correspondence.
Example:
Let 4,3,5,1,2 and 5,2,4,1,3 be two arrangements of the numbers in N5. To find their product. First, convert them to functions:
[5.5] (Inverses) The inverse of a permutation is a permutation.
Notation: if f is a permutation on some finite set, then f-1 is also a permutation on that set.
The statement follows immediately from the fact that the inverse of a one-to-one correspondence is a one-to-one correspondence ([4.5]).
Example:
The arrangement 5,2,4,1,3 represents a permutation. Find its inverse.
Convert this arrangement into arrow notation (replacing the numbers of the normal arrangement with this arrangement):
As a check, form the product of the original function and its inverse:
[5.6] (Cycle) A cycle (a1 a2 ... ak ) of numbers taken from a source Nn where n is not less than k, denotes the carrying of numbers
A cycle may or may not involve all numbers of the source. For example (2 5 3) does not involve all numbers in source N5. until what happens to the missing numbers is known, this cycle alone might not represent the desired permutation on the source. Since a permutation must involve all numbers in the source, involvement of numbers 1 and 4 are needed. Let (1 4) be the cycle involving them. The permutation can be defined by (a product of) two (disjoint) cycles
Consider now the cycle (1 4 2 5) with numbers taken from source N5. In chains of arrows, this cycle represents
[5.7] (Trivial cycle) A cycle is trivial (has only one number in it) if and only if that number is a fixed point in the arrow notation.
The permutation on N7 defined by
[5.8] (Equality of cycles) Two cycles are equal if and only if the arrow notations of them are the same.
For example, Let the source be N5. Each of the cycles
Cycles without a common object in them are called disjoint. The cycles
It is possible that not all the objects in the source are involved in cycles. If N8 is the source then the cycle
[5.9] Two permutations in the form of disjoint cycles are equal if and only their functions in arrow notation are equal.
It is possible that two or more cycles are not disjoint. Then they are considered as products of permutations. Each can be coverted to arrow notations and then the product can be computed. Then that result can be converted back to cyclic notation.
-----
Every cycle has a smallest natural number in it. A cycle is in standard form if its left most number in the smallest in the cycle. For example,
[5.10] (Parity of a cycle) A cycle is even if its length + 1 is even, and odd if length + 1 is odd.
The above cycles